The length and detail of his statement regarding the so-called fake collapse of the Soviet Union create the impression of someone who genuinely believes everything they wrote. There are however, glaring problems with some of the many claims made by "Dean Jackson" in his statement that I would happily refute, but the six years that have passed since the statement was written preclude legitimate discourse. Suffice it to say that the most egregious and hearty efforts to make the US intelligence community look like it failed to prevent a total Marxist government infiltration AND our lack of verification of the Soviet Union collapse are the only true failures that are brought to light by his long repetitive rant. There was indeed a collapse that has been thoroughly vetted by investigation of every government institution and private sector businesses alike. One of Jackson's larger failures was the simple belief the US and her allies are as deeply vested in the overthrow of Russia as his letter indicates. The truth is the people of the west are not as interested in communist life as he believes. As for their "military advances and improvements" the Russian Army is a joke compared to the United States. The sheer volume of collected rust among Russian military storage compounds where tanks are wasting away and missile components stacked like firewood are easily viewed using Google Maps or Earth. That leaves air, ground and naval components, which are even less of a threat to the west.

The Putin Crime Commission is so busy accumulating additional wealth the Russian Army has been spread over too many countries in his support to form a useful battle plan against the west. We currently outnumber their ground troops by ten to twelve fighters per each single Russian. In fact, we need only the United States Marine Corps by itself to stomp Russia into the stone age. Our troops are VOLUNTEERS not conscripted or drafted. That alone should terrify the weak Russian military. If there was a more timely statement of Dean Jackson's to respond to there would be a similarly lengthy rebuttal, so I will leave with the final statement that Russia is the aggressor nation behind most of the world's wars, not the United States. People in the west really aren't concerned about Russia on any given day.

Listen, Fella, I don't know whether your bastard name of DEAN and JACK comes from your parentage - but you seem rather pinched - like Jews, Poles and Khokhols are on the Russian matter. The hatred of Russia before all, even before uberall Deutschland. The one and only partizan of nazism in Eastern European countries are the same - local & emmigrated Jews, Poles and so called Khokhols, western ukranians from gAlizia (from which comes the name of Golitsyn/Yeltsin (Rzech Pospolitaia's) prince family in the former Galizia).

Throughout KGB defector Major Anatoliy Golitsyn’s second book 'The Perestroika Deception' (1995) the author decries the West’s blind acceptance of the political and economic changes that occurred within the Soviet Bloc, culminating in the collapse of the East Bloc and later the collapse of the USSR. In a typical passage denoting exasperation that can be found throughout the book, Golitsyn writes:

"Western acceptance of the changes in the USSR and Eastern Europe as a trend towards genuine democracy which serves Western interests and therefore merits Western support show how little the West comprehends the essence of the changes and the dangers they entail. In part this non-comprehension arises from confusion over terminology. What the West calls ‘democratisation’, Soviet strategists call the transformation of the ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’ into the ‘state of the whole people’."

Western governments, of course, are well aware that the collapse of the USSR (and East Bloc) is a strategic ruse, its purpose to lull the West into complacency, and the West keeps its silence concerning the ruse, enabling the ruse, because the political parties and institutions of the West were long co-opted by Marxists, including co-option of Western intelligence agencies such as the CIA. Golitsyn wouldn’t have been aware that the political parties of the West were already long co-opted by Marxists when he wrote his first book, New Lies for Old (1984), and had no reason to suspect Marxist co-option of the West even during the process of collapse within the USSR. After the collapse, however, is a different story. Because the USSR altered its strategy (no doubt after the publication of New Lies for Old) and instead of utilizing a 'liberalization' ruse it instead opted for a 'liberalization resulting in a collapse' ruse, a 'liberalization resulting in a collapse' ruse would have clued Golitsyn to the Marxist pedigree of the West, globe even, by the time he was preparing The Perestroika Deception for publication.

We clearly discern the fraudulent collapse of the USSR by (1) the continued existence of thousands of statues to the anathema Lenin standing proudly throughout Russia; (2) the continued existence of anathema Soviet iconography; and (3) post USSR electorates electing back into power Soviet era Communist Party member Quislings. With a liberalization' ruse there would be no problems with the continued existence of such Soviet themed artifacts and electing into power Communist Party members, but with a 'liberalization resulting in a collapse' ruse those Soviet artifacts and elections are tell tale signs proving that the collapse of the USSR is a strategic ruse. Under Golitsyn's original understanding, as presented in New Lies for Old, the USSR was to only 'liberalize', after which the continued existence of Soviet themed artifacts and the election of Communist Party members would be normal. Not normal, however, if the USSR had collapsed. Indeed, the fact that not one political party in the West voiced a need to verify the collapse of the USSR would have also alerted Golitsyn that the political parties of the West were co-opted by Marxists, since the survival of the West depends on verification.

In The Perestroika Deception Golitsyn doesn't discuss what he knows concerning the Marxist co-option of the West (the book is a mere collection of memorandum the author submitted to the CIA between 1973 and October 1995), which is where this researcher fills in the gaps. The following succinct proof proves the Marxist co-option of the West...

The West never verified the collapse of the USSR because no collapse occurred, since if a real collapse had occurred the West would have verified it, since the survival of the West depends on verification. Conversely, this proves that the political parties of the West were co-opted by Marxists long before the fraudulent collapse of the USSR, since the survival of the West depends on verification.

In fact, the 'freed' Soviets and West also never (1) de-Communized the Soviet Armed Forces of its Communist Party officer corps, which was 90% officered by Communist Party members; and (2) arrested/de-mobilized the 5-6 million vigilantes that assisted the Soviet Union's Ministry of the Interior and police control the populations of the larger cities during the period of Perestroika (1986-1991).

Due to New Lies for Old, the USSR was (1) forced to alter its strategy; which (2a) allows one to empirically verify the fraudulent collapse of the USSR; thereby (2b) also allowing one to empirically verify the Marxist infiltration of the West's political parties and institutions.

Two discoveries I made in April 2015:

(I) Communist control of Yugoslavia ‘civil wars’ gone unnoticed.

Secessionist Yugoslav Orthodox, Catholic and Muslim factions waged dirty wars against each other, neglecting to first wipe out the 9% of the population that attempted to do away with religion in Yugoslavia, proving the wars were orchestrated and controlled by the communist faction.

Murder, torture and legal discrimination of those professing religious sentiment was so intense under the Marxist regime in Belgrade, that those who professed no religious affiliation increased from less than 10% pre-1945 to a bewildering 32% by 1987...

"Like in most former Communist countries in Central, Eastern and South­‑Eastern Europe, the means and actions applied by the Yugoslav Government between 1945 and 1990 to reduce the influence of religions and religious organisations were quite effective: While there was just a tiny group of people who regarded themselves to be without a religion before the Second World War (less than 0.1% of the population), this number grew to 13% in 1953 and to 32% in 1987."

That 9% constitutes members of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia, the Marxist party that subjugated Yugoslavia from 1945 until the party's dissolution in January 1990. Before any religious sectarian strife, first there would have been massive reprisals against the reviled Communists who implemented policies to wipe out religion in Yugoslavia. The fact that no such reprisals took place proves that the breakup of Yugoslavia, during the Yugoslav Wars (1991-2001), was manufactured and controlled by the Communists; and

(II) When Soviet citizens were liberated from up to 74 years of horrific Marxist-atheist oppression on December 26, 1991, the day the USSR officially ended, there were ZERO celebrations throughout the USSR, proving (1) the ‘collapse’ of the USSR is a strategic ruse; and (2) the political parties of the West were already co-opted by Marxists, otherwise the USSR (and East Bloc nations) couldn't have gotten away with the ruse.

ZERO celebrations, as the The Atlantic article inadvertently informs us...

Google: The Atlantic magazine 20 Years Since The Fall of the Soviet Union

Notice, however, the Kremlin staged anti-government demonstrations that took place in Russia (and other Soviet republics) in the years immediately preceding the 'collapse', yet ZERO celebrations after the 'collapse'!

The above means that the so-called ‘War on Terror’ is an operation being carried out by the Marxist co-opted governments of the West in alliance with the USSR and other Communist nations, the purpose being to (1) destroy the prominence of the West in the eyes of the world, where the West is seen (i) invading nations without cause; (ii) causing chaos around the globe; and (iii) killing over one-million civilians and boasting of torture; (2) close off non-Russian supplies of oil for export, thereby increasing the price of oil, the higher price allowing oil exporting Russia to maintain economic stability while she modernizes and increases her military forces; (3) destroy the United States Armed Forces via the never-ending ‘War on Terror’; the ultimate purpose of the aforementioned to (4) bring about the demise of the United States in the world, opening up a political void to be filled by a new pan-national entity composed of Europe and Russia (replacing the European Union), a union ‘From the Atlantic to Vladivostok’; which will (5) see the end of NATO.

The West never verified the collapse of the USSR because no collapse occurred, since if a real collapse had occurred the West would have verified it, since the survival of the West depends on verification. Conversely, this proves that the political parties of the West were co-opted by Marxists long before the fraudulent collapse of the USSR, since the survival of the West depends on verification.

Conclusion:

The West will form new political parties where candidates are vetted for Marxist ideology, the use of the polygraph to be an important tool for such vetting. Then the West can finally liberate the globe of vanguard Communism.